(NNPA)—Fifty years ago, President Lyndon Baines Johnson declared a war on poverty.  Appalled by the way too many Americans lived, he empowered federal workers to develop and implement programs that created jobs, health care, housing and legal assistance.  Some of the funds were given to states, and some were given to cities.  In any case, President Johnson was committed to closing income gaps, and up to a point, he was successful.

He had to overcome two sets of obstacles.  One was Republican resistance (Sounds familiar?); the other was competing needs, especially, in 1968, of the war in Vietnam.  Johnson poignantly explained his choices.  He said he had to give up “the woman he loved—the Great Society—to get involved in that b—- of a war.”

President Obama, too, interested in issues of poverty and inequality.  To be sure, these are not issues he focused on during his first term as president.  Indeed, I’ve described his actions as late and great.  He has spent this past month in speeches and gatherings addressing poverty and ways to eliminate it.  Like Johnson, he is likely to face a hostile Congress and budged constraints to get these programs.  Still, in highlighting just a few areas—Los Angeles, San Antonio, Philadelphia, the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, and Southeastern Kentucky—the president picked a good mix of urban and rural areas, as well as population diversity.  Were I choosing, however, I’d add the District of Columbia, where President Obama could throw a stone to find the poorest area in Ward 8, and one of the richest areas in Ward 3.  On this matter, though, I’ll not be a distractor.  It’s about time the poor got some attention.

1 2Next page »

Also On New Pittsburgh Courier:
comments – Add Yours